<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE CURRENT STATE OF COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE FINANCING</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198</link>
	<description>Southern California Office Real Estate Blog is your key to buying + selling in the Los Angeles office market.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CRE News</title>
		<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-142057</link>
		<dc:creator>CRE News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-142057</guid>
		<description>Small-Cap Properties See Continued Rent Drops, But Less Than Before

Rents at small-capitalization properties continued to fall last month, but the rate of decline has tapered off somewhat, which might indicate that the worst could be over for the sector.

According to Boxwood Means Inc., a Stamford, Conn., research company that focuses on small-cap properties, all sectors continued to see rental drops, with industrial and certain retail buildings seeing the biggest drops. But those declines are nowhere near as large as they had been during the market's freefall during the middle of last year, when monthly drops in some subsectors were greater than 100 basis points.

Another reason for optimism: Boxwood has found a strong correlation between the performance of the residential housing market and small-cap commercial properties. And the residential market has seen an uptick in sales and potential stabilization of pricing, which could portend a period of stabilization for many small-cap properties, particularly retail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small-Cap Properties See Continued Rent Drops, But Less Than Before</p>
<p>Rents at small-capitalization properties continued to fall last month, but the rate of decline has tapered off somewhat, which might indicate that the worst could be over for the sector.</p>
<p>According to Boxwood Means Inc., a Stamford, Conn., research company that focuses on small-cap properties, all sectors continued to see rental drops, with industrial and certain retail buildings seeing the biggest drops. But those declines are nowhere near as large as they had been during the market&#8217;s freefall during the middle of last year, when monthly drops in some subsectors were greater than 100 basis points.</p>
<p>Another reason for optimism: Boxwood has found a strong correlation between the performance of the residential housing market and small-cap commercial properties. And the residential market has seen an uptick in sales and potential stabilization of pricing, which could portend a period of stabilization for many small-cap properties, particularly retail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus &#38; Millichap</title>
		<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-102521</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus &#38; Millichap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-102521</guid>
		<description>High levels of construction have weakened fundamentals for medical-office buildings and could mute what has been comparatively strong investor demand in the sector.

Investor demand for the sector, commonly referred to as MOB, is slowing most markedly in the West/Pacific Northwest and Southwest/Mountain regions, where construction deliveries have bumped up vacancy rates and driven down rents. It expects investor interest to remain strong in the Southeast, Northeast and Midwest despite their own high levels of construction. 

The study noted that nationwide, construction activity in the sector peaked at 17 million square feet last year. This year, another 14 million sf is expected to be added, increasing the total MOB inventory by 2.6 percent to 538.5 million sf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High levels of construction have weakened fundamentals for medical-office buildings and could mute what has been comparatively strong investor demand in the sector.</p>
<p>Investor demand for the sector, commonly referred to as MOB, is slowing most markedly in the West/Pacific Northwest and Southwest/Mountain regions, where construction deliveries have bumped up vacancy rates and driven down rents. It expects investor interest to remain strong in the Southeast, Northeast and Midwest despite their own high levels of construction. </p>
<p>The study noted that nationwide, construction activity in the sector peaked at 17 million square feet last year. This year, another 14 million sf is expected to be added, increasing the total MOB inventory by 2.6 percent to 538.5 million sf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Froehlich</title>
		<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-94420</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Froehlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-94420</guid>
		<description>Nationalize both Citigroup and Bank of America right now for a pre-determined time frame of something like five years, and we can quickly get the banking system working again. Plus this way we wouldn't have to worry about trying to figure out how to price those "toxic assets" currently on these bank's balance sheets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nationalize both Citigroup and Bank of America right now for a pre-determined time frame of something like five years, and we can quickly get the banking system working again. Plus this way we wouldn&#8217;t have to worry about trying to figure out how to price those &#8220;toxic assets&#8221; currently on these bank&#8217;s balance sheets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Howard  - GlobeSt.com</title>
		<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-90429</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Howard  - GlobeSt.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-90429</guid>
		<description>A joint venture of Van Nuys-based Sharp Capital Group and Axiom Real Estate has taken title to a 52-unit condominium project after acquiring a nonperforming loan on the property.

The condominium project that the Sharp-Axiom joint venture has taken title to is at the corner of North Union Avenue and West Temple Street in Echo Park. The price that Sharp paid was undisclosed, but it's been revealed that the joint venture bought the loan at a significant discount, then foreclosed on the property and took title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A joint venture of Van Nuys-based Sharp Capital Group and Axiom Real Estate has taken title to a 52-unit condominium project after acquiring a nonperforming loan on the property.</p>
<p>The condominium project that the Sharp-Axiom joint venture has taken title to is at the corner of North Union Avenue and West Temple Street in Echo Park. The price that Sharp paid was undisclosed, but it&#8217;s been revealed that the joint venture bought the loan at a significant discount, then foreclosed on the property and took title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Times Online</title>
		<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-89250</link>
		<dc:creator>Times Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-89250</guid>
		<description>Fallout from the housing collapse spread to other areas. Builders cut spending on commercial construction projects by 21.1 per cent and house builders slashed spending at a 22.2 per cent pace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fallout from the housing collapse spread to other areas. Builders cut spending on commercial construction projects by 21.1 per cent and house builders slashed spending at a 22.2 per cent pace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market Matters Weekly Advisory</title>
		<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-87493</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Matters Weekly Advisory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-87493</guid>
		<description>Lenders declare foreclosure halt
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, JPMorgan Chase &#38; Co., Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America Corp. announced they are halting foreclosures through March 6, while President Obama works out the details of his housing plan.  Citigroup said it will halt foreclosures until the administration has completed the details of the program or March 12, whichever is earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lenders declare foreclosure halt<br />
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co., Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America Corp. announced they are halting foreclosures through March 6, while President Obama works out the details of his housing plan.  Citigroup said it will halt foreclosures until the administration has completed the details of the program or March 12, whichever is earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-87173</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-87173</guid>
		<description>Where is the justice in the pure GREED that was exhibited by the banks and just WHY should future generations be paying for these greedy so called executives??

This view is absolutely right -- there is no justice here. Taxpayers should not be in this position. But the bailout isn't about justice. It's about survival. The central thesis of the article was that without government help, there was a good chance that our banking system would collapse, and that would result in unbelievable pain for all of us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the justice in the pure GREED that was exhibited by the banks and just WHY should future generations be paying for these greedy so called executives??</p>
<p>This view is absolutely right &#8212; there is no justice here. Taxpayers should not be in this position. But the bailout isn&#8217;t about justice. It&#8217;s about survival. The central thesis of the article was that without government help, there was a good chance that our banking system would collapse, and that would result in unbelievable pain for all of us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lipman</title>
		<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-48059</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lipman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 06:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-48059</guid>
		<description>I would like to make my special mortgage
services available to you in case your clients or buyers needs are not met
by regular lenders. 

My company has been in business for over 25 years. We have local private
investor money available and use common sense underwriting at below market
hard money rates. 

If I can be of service to you or to just pass a deal by me, please feel free
to call me at 818-887-3901 or email me at dan@computer-mortgage.com. 

Good Luck with your listing. 

Regards, 

Danny Lipman
Computer Mortgage Corporation
818-887-3901
dan@computer-mortgage.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to make my special mortgage<br />
services available to you in case your clients or buyers needs are not met<br />
by regular lenders. </p>
<p>My company has been in business for over 25 years. We have local private<br />
investor money available and use common sense underwriting at below market<br />
hard money rates. </p>
<p>If I can be of service to you or to just pass a deal by me, please feel free<br />
to call me at 818-887-3901 or email me at <a href="mailto:dan@computer-mortgage.com">dan@computer-mortgage.com</a>. </p>
<p>Good Luck with your listing. </p>
<p>Regards, </p>
<p>Danny Lipman<br />
Computer Mortgage Corporation<br />
818-887-3901<br />
<a href="mailto:dan@computer-mortgage.com">dan@computer-mortgage.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CRE News</title>
		<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-39497</link>
		<dc:creator>CRE News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-39497</guid>
		<description>Detroit's Office Vacancy Highest in 10 Years 

The office vacancy rate in metropolitan Detroit climbed to 22.6% in Q2 from 22% during Q1. It is the region's highest level of vacancy in almost a decade. Roughly 690,111 sf of space returned to the market in Q2. The vacancy rate in Detroit's central business district remained flat at 28.2%, while Troy posted a 27% vacancy rate in the quarter. Dearborn was the region's healthiest submarket with a 27% vacancy rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Detroit&#8217;s Office Vacancy Highest in 10 Years </p>
<p>The office vacancy rate in metropolitan Detroit climbed to 22.6% in Q2 from 22% during Q1. It is the region&#8217;s highest level of vacancy in almost a decade. Roughly 690,111 sf of space returned to the market in Q2. The vacancy rate in Detroit&#8217;s central business district remained flat at 28.2%, while Troy posted a 27% vacancy rate in the quarter. Dearborn was the region&#8217;s healthiest submarket with a 27% vacancy rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNN Money</title>
		<link>http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-32356</link>
		<dc:creator>CNN Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socalofficerealestateblog.com/?p=198#comment-32356</guid>
		<description>Banks miss an easy housing fix
Mortgage lenders say they are there to help homeowners who are having trouble making their monthly payments
but who can’t sell their home for what it is worth in today’s market. But real estate agents and others say both
homeowners and the banks themselves lose out when banks are unable to close so-called “short sale”
transactions.
Keep this in mind . . .
• In a short sale, homesellers ask their lender to accept a buyer’s offer that is less than the amount needed to pay
off the balance of the mortgage. Lenders who agree to a short sale also typically agree to forgive the remaining
debt.
• Many call short sales a win-win for lenders and homeowners. The homeowner avoids foreclosure and banks
avoid the cost of carrying the property through the lengthy foreclosure process, not to mention the hassles of
selling an empty property in a market saturated with other foreclosures.
• On average, lenders lose approximately 19 percent of a mortgage’s value with a short sale but lose an average
of 40 percent on mortgages that proceed to foreclosure, according to one source.
• The problem with short sales? Like other foreclosure mitigation efforts, the challenge is in determining which
financial entity “owns” the loan and, thus, has the final say on a short sale offer. Banks also have been slow to
ramp up internal processes needed to review and approve short sale packages. Delays and last-minute
dickering often prolong or even derail transaction closings and creates frustration for potential homebuyers and
their real estate agents.
To read the full story, please click here:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/28/real_estate/short_sales_long_waits/index.htm?postversion=2008052811</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banks miss an easy housing fix<br />
Mortgage lenders say they are there to help homeowners who are having trouble making their monthly payments<br />
but who can’t sell their home for what it is worth in today’s market. But real estate agents and others say both<br />
homeowners and the banks themselves lose out when banks are unable to close so-called “short sale”<br />
transactions.<br />
Keep this in mind . . .<br />
• In a short sale, homesellers ask their lender to accept a buyer’s offer that is less than the amount needed to pay<br />
off the balance of the mortgage. Lenders who agree to a short sale also typically agree to forgive the remaining<br />
debt.<br />
• Many call short sales a win-win for lenders and homeowners. The homeowner avoids foreclosure and banks<br />
avoid the cost of carrying the property through the lengthy foreclosure process, not to mention the hassles of<br />
selling an empty property in a market saturated with other foreclosures.<br />
• On average, lenders lose approximately 19 percent of a mortgage’s value with a short sale but lose an average<br />
of 40 percent on mortgages that proceed to foreclosure, according to one source.<br />
• The problem with short sales? Like other foreclosure mitigation efforts, the challenge is in determining which<br />
financial entity “owns” the loan and, thus, has the final say on a short sale offer. Banks also have been slow to<br />
ramp up internal processes needed to review and approve short sale packages. Delays and last-minute<br />
dickering often prolong or even derail transaction closings and creates frustration for potential homebuyers and<br />
their real estate agents.<br />
To read the full story, please click here:<br />
<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/28/real_estate/short_sales_long_waits/index.htm?postversion=2008052811" rel="nofollow">http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/28/real_estate/short_sales_long_waits/index.htm?postversion=2008052811</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
